Liberty Indian
Posted in Uncategorized on 09/14/2003 10:20 pm by admin
Liberty Indian
 |
 NICE RARE 1907 INDIAN HEAD CENT AU FULL LIBERTY 4 DIAMONDS LOW SHIPPING LQQK  US $9.99
|
In the essay entitled, Joseph Brant Compares Indian and White Civilizations, 1789, Mr.Brant describes his feelings of disgust for White civilization and why he had those feelings. The essay seems be the answer to a question that asked him to compare the civilizations of Indians and Whites. He discusses how his life changed when he was sent to live amongst Whites to be educated when he was an adolescent. Although his people were thought of as savages, he never lost pride in his culture and came to view the White world with contempt.
He states, "We do not hunger and thirst after those superfluities of life, that are theruin of thousands of families among you. Our ornaments, in general, are simple, and easily obtained. Envy and covetousness, those worms that destroy the fair flower of human happiness, are unknown in this climate" (Hoffman & Gjerde, p.198).
Mr. Brant obviously felt that although the Indians were not rich with material wealth, they were happier than Whites because they were not consumed with the greed that comes with money. The Indian nation wore no crown jewels and owned no land, but they were filled with the spirit of God and their ancestors. They had no need for anything else. He also expresses great disdain at how Whites treated other Whites because of class differences.
He states that "The palaces and prisons among you, form a most dreadful contrast. Go to the former places, and you will see, perhaps, a deformed piece of earth swelled with prideBhere descriptions utterly fails!Bcertainly the sight of an Indian torture, is not half so painful to a well informed mind"(Hoffman & Gjerde, p.199). It was hard for him to grasp the concept of a society that claimed to be so God-fearing and holier than thou could treat its inhabitants so badly based on material worth. He had a deep disgust for penal system used by America and Europe. He felt that because the majority of prisoners were confined for debt, White culture had a lot of nerve calling Indian nations cruel because of their different cultural beliefs. At least they were not locking up people for stealing food.
European and American civilization as seen through the eyes of Joseph Brant is a cruel place where gaining material wealth is all that matters and rights of its citizens means little. The estates of widows and orphans were often swallowed up by the court system, most of people that are in prison are there because of debt, and worship of God is second to worship of money. Hypocrisy and greed are its greatest components. The Native American civilization from which he came from, was a place where everyone was treated equally. Materialism did not exist, so there was no need to compete with others over who had the most possessions. Their allegiance was to the Great Spirit and to the land.
In European society, what one owned determined one's lot in life. People were imprisoned because they owed money. They confiscated land for their own use and whether someone else was living on it did not matter. the Indians had no concept of money and had no need for the glitter and gold of White civilization. They had no laws expect what was written in the hearts of its people. They had no prisons because crimes such as robbery did not exist. There was no need to steal. Everyone was equal and shared their resources. Although their lives were simple, they were richer because they had what many in European civilization did not; a nobility of spirit that could never be crushed. Joseph Brant knew this and that is why he looked upon Whites with contempt.
After much thought, and without prejudice, Joseph Brant felt that his civilization was better than White civilization and he gave some sound advice to Whites that can be used in today's society. There is a biblical saying that goes, "You without sin cast the first stone," and that is the point that Joseph Brant makes. The White society that he lived in had to clean up its own backyard before trying to clean up someone else's. How could a society that claimed to be Christian treats its inhabitants and other cultures so dishonorably? White civilization in the 1700s and in today's society still have not learned to practice what they so piously preach. How can true liberty for all exist when monetary gain is placed above everything? Those with money and power in White civilization are the ones with liberty and that is not fair to those who are still struggling to find their way. Freedom should not have to come with a price tag attached to it.
The words that Joseph Brant spoke two hundred and fifteen years ago still ring true. "Cease then, while these practices continue among you, to call yourselves Christians, lest you publish to the world your hypocrisy. Cease to call other nations savages, when you are tenfold more the children of cruelty, than they," (Hoffman & Gjerde, p.199). In the case of the dominant civilization, the pot is still calling the kettle black and it sad that its inhabitants have not learned a thing.
|
|
On Liberty $12.86 No one can be a great thinker who does not recognise, that as a thinker it is his first duty to follow his intellect to whatever conclusions it may lead. Truth gains more even by the errors of one who, with due study and preparation, thinks for himself, than by the true opinions of those who only hold them because they do not suffer themselves to think. -John Stuart Mill, in On Liberty Often mentioned in the same breath with the Communist Manifesto, On Liberty-perhaps the greatest work from British political philosopher John Stuart Mill-is one of the most profound and most hotly debated works of the 19th century. Is it a classic plea for human freedom and intellectual development... or is it factually wrong and morally offensive? English philosopher and politician JOHN STUART MILL (1806-1873) was one of the foremost figure of Western intellectual thought in the late 19th century. He served as an administrator in the East Indian Company from 1823 to 1858, and as a member of parliament from 1865 to 1868. |
|
|
Liberty $179.99 Liberty |
|
|
At Liberty $19.99 At Liberty |
|
|
Indian $899.99 Indian |
|
|
The Indian - $12.99 The Indian - |
|
|
The Sons of Liberty $3.99 Forget everything you thought you knew about America's early days - history packs a punch in this full-color, two-fisted, edge-of-your-seat adventure! Graham and Brody are runaway slaves blessed with extraordinary powers. At first they keep a low profile. But their mentor has another idea - one that involves the African martial art dambe . . . and masks. Visual and visceral, this is a tale that could only be told as a graphic novel. With its vile villains, electrifying action, and riveting suspense, The Sons of Liberty casts new light on the faces and events of pre-Revolution America, from Ben Franklin to the French and Indian War. American history has rarely been this compelling - and it's never looked this good. |
|
|
The Sons Of Liberty $5.99 Graphic novels are a revolution in literature, and The Sons of Liberty is a graphic novel like no other. Visual and visceral, fusing historical fiction and superhero action, this is a tale with broad appeal - for younger readers who enjoy an exciting war story, for teenagers asking hard questions about American history, for adult fans of comic books, for anyone seeking stories of African American interest, and for reluctant readers young and old.   In Colonial America, Graham and Brody are slaves on the run-until they gain extraordinary powers. At first they keep a low profile. But their mentor has another idea-one that involves the African martial art dambe . . . and masks.   With its vile villains, electrifying action, and riveting suspense, The Sons of Liberty casts new light on the faces and events of pre-Revolution America, including Ben Franklin and the French and Indian War. American history has rarely been this compelling - and it's never looked this good. |