Cent Brilliant

Cent Brilliant

1908 S Indian Head Cents Choice Brilliant Uncirculated
1908 S Indian Head Cents Choice Brilliant Uncirculated
Paypal   US $500.00
1967 Canada 25 cent SILVER BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED
1967 Canada 25 cent SILVER BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED
Paypal   US $35.99
Lot of 5 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 2000s Brilliant Condition
Lot of 5 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 2000s Brilliant Condition
Paypal   US $7.00
Lot of 2 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1992 S 1999 S Brilliant Condition
Lot of 2 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1992 S 1999 S Brilliant Condition
Paypal   US $6.00
Lot of 2 Gem Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1992 S 1999 S Brilliant Condition
Lot of 2 Gem Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1992 S 1999 S Brilliant Condition
Paypal   US $6.00
Lot of 2 Gem Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 2000 S 2004 S Brilliant Condition
Lot of 2 Gem Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 2000 S 2004 S Brilliant Condition
Paypal   US $4.00
Lot of 4 Proof and Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1950s Brilliant Condition
Lot of 4 Proof and Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1950s Brilliant Condition
Paypal   US $8.00
Lot of 7 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1960s 1970s Brilliant Condition
Lot of 7 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1960s 1970s Brilliant Condition
Paypal   US $14.00
Lot of 8 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1960s 1970s Brilliant Condition
Lot of 8 Proof Uncirculated Cents Pennies 1960s 1970s Brilliant Condition
Paypal   US $16.00
1951 D BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED ONE CENT 1c ROLL PENNIES 50 COINS
1951 D BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED ONE CENT 1c ROLL PENNIES 50 COINS
Paypal   US $29.95
NETHERLANDS 1951 FIVE CENTS 5c KM181 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED RED
NETHERLANDS 1951 FIVE CENTS 5c KM181 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED RED
Paypal   US $37.95
1943 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED C595
1943 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED C595
Paypal   US $.99
2012 50 cent Brilliant Uncirculated
2012 50 cent Brilliant Uncirculated
Paypal   US $2.19
1940 LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1370
1940 LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1370
Paypal   US $.99
1958 LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1381
1958 LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1381
Paypal   US $.99
1953 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1375
1953 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1375
Paypal   US $.99
1943 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED C590
1943 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED C590
Paypal   US $.99
1955 DSLINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1376
1955 DSLINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1376
Paypal   US $.99
1943 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED C588
1943 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED C588
Paypal   US $.99
1952 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1374
1952 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1374
Paypal   US $.99
1956 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1377
1956 D LINCOLN WHEAT CENT GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1377
Paypal   US $.99
1943 LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1372
1943 LINCOLN WHEAT CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LUSTER C1372
Paypal   US $.99
Gorgeous 1909 VDB Lincoln Wheat Cent MS Uncirculated Brilliant Red Luster
Gorgeous 1909 VDB Lincoln Wheat Cent MS Uncirculated Brilliant Red Luster
Paypal   US $10.45
Brilliant AU Lincoln Memorial Cent Collection
Brilliant AU Lincoln Memorial Cent Collection
Paypal   US $44.99
High Grade Old US Coin Liberty V Nickel 1883 No Cents BU Brilliant Uncirculated
High Grade Old US Coin Liberty V Nickel 1883 No Cents BU Brilliant Uncirculated
Paypal   US $9.99
1981 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1981 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1982 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1982 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1983 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1983 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1984 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1984 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1986 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1986 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1988 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1988 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1990 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1990 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1993 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
1993 Canada 25 Cents Proof Cameo Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1979 Canada 25 Cents proof Gem Brilliant
1979 Canada 25 Cents proof Gem Brilliant
Paypal   US $.99
1909 VDB LINCOLN ONE CENT PENNY BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED CONDITION NO RESERVE
1909 VDB LINCOLN ONE CENT PENNY BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED CONDITION NO RESERVE
Paypal   US $9.99
1964 5 cent Canadian Coin BRILLIANT AU
1964 5 cent Canadian Coin BRILLIANT AU
Paypal   US $1.75
1959 D Lincoln Cent Gem Brilliant Uncirculated Five Rolls of 50 coins OBW B8034L
1959 D Lincoln Cent Gem Brilliant Uncirculated Five Rolls of 50 coins OBW B8034L
Paypal   US $27.00
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2009 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2009 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
Paypal   US $.99
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2010 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2010 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
Paypal   US $.99
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2011 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2011 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
Paypal   US $.99
2011 Canada 25 Cents COLORED PEREGRINE FALCON Coin Mint State Brilliant Unc
2011 Canada 25 Cents COLORED PEREGRINE FALCON Coin Mint State Brilliant Unc
Paypal   US $.99
2011 Canada 25 Cents ORCA WHALE Coin Mint State Brilliant Uncirculated BRAND NEW
2011 Canada 25 Cents ORCA WHALE Coin Mint State Brilliant Uncirculated BRAND NEW
Paypal   US $.99
FF 1909 VDB Lincoln cent Brilliant Uncirculated See Picture
FF 1909 VDB Lincoln cent Brilliant Uncirculated See Picture
Paypal   US $1.00
1951 Proof Cent PCGS PR64 RED Brilliant Red Blazer Free Shipment
1951 Proof Cent PCGS PR64 RED Brilliant Red Blazer Free Shipment
Paypal   US $55.00
1955 Proof Cent PCGS PR66 RED Brilliant Red Blazer Free Shipment
1955 Proof Cent PCGS PR66 RED Brilliant Red Blazer Free Shipment
Paypal   US $55.00
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2008 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
6 Cyprus Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2008 1 2 5 cent BRILLIANT UNC Zypern
Paypal   US $.99
Lot of Four Brilliant Steel Cents
Lot of Four Brilliant Steel Cents
Paypal   US $6.00
2009 Lincoln Cent Formative Years NGC Brilliant Uncirculated
2009 Lincoln Cent Formative Years NGC Brilliant Uncirculated
Paypal   US $3.95
2009 D Lincoln Cent Professional Life NGC Brilliant Uncirculated
2009 D Lincoln Cent Professional Life NGC Brilliant Uncirculated
Paypal   US $3.95
NETHERLANDS 1944 25 CENTS SILVER COIN BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED
NETHERLANDS 1944 25 CENTS SILVER COIN BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED
Paypal   US $9.99
NO RESERVE 1902 INDIAN HEAD Cent BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED FREE SHIPPING
NO RESERVE 1902 INDIAN HEAD Cent BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED FREE SHIPPING
Paypal   US $14.99
NO RESERVE 1905 INDIAN HEAD Cent BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED FREE SHIPPING
NO RESERVE 1905 INDIAN HEAD Cent BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED FREE SHIPPING
Paypal   US $13.99
1883 Liberty Nickel No Cents BU Brilliant Uncirculated W Luster Problem Free
1883 Liberty Nickel No Cents BU Brilliant Uncirculated W Luster Problem Free
Paypal   US $7.51
1939 P Lincoln Wheat Cent BU Brilliant Red
1939 P Lincoln Wheat Cent BU Brilliant Red
Paypal   US $3.99
1956 D BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LINCOLN WHEAT CENT CLIPPED CORNER ERROR COIN
1956 D BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LINCOLN WHEAT CENT CLIPPED CORNER ERROR COIN
Paypal   US $4.99
2012 Canadian 50 cents BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED MINT from ROLL
2012 Canadian 50 cents BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED MINT from ROLL
Paypal   US $1.94
2012 Canada Uncirculated Brilliant Mint 1 Cent 1 Full Roll of 50 Magnetic
2012 Canada Uncirculated Brilliant Mint 1 Cent 1 Full Roll of 50 Magnetic
Paypal   US $6.80
1968 S 1971 S 1972 S 1973 S AND 1974 S LINCOLN CENT PENNY COIN BRILLIANT
1968 S 1971 S 1972 S 1973 S AND 1974 S LINCOLN CENT PENNY COIN BRILLIANT
Paypal   US $2.88
1911 Canada 5 cent MS 63 brilliant UNC
1911 Canada 5 cent MS 63 brilliant UNC
Paypal   US $72.94
EE 1909 VDB Lincoln cent Brilliant Uncirculated See Picture
EE 1909 VDB Lincoln cent Brilliant Uncirculated See Picture
Paypal   US $1.00
CANADA 1900H CENT KM7 CHOICE BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BU RED BROWN
CANADA 1900H CENT KM7 CHOICE BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BU RED BROWN
Paypal   US $65.00
CANADA 1915 LARGE CENT KM21 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
CANADA 1915 LARGE CENT KM21 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
Paypal   US $89.95
CANADA 1912 LARGE CENT KM21 CHOICE BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED RED BROWN CH BU RB
CANADA 1912 LARGE CENT KM21 CHOICE BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED RED BROWN CH BU RB
Paypal   US $55.00
CANADA 1911 LARGE CENT KM15 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
CANADA 1911 LARGE CENT KM15 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
Paypal   US $52.00
CANADA 1914 LARGE CENT KM21 CHOICE BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN CH BU BRN
CANADA 1914 LARGE CENT KM21 CHOICE BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN CH BU BRN
Paypal   US $74.00
CANADA 1918 LARGE CENT KM21 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
CANADA 1918 LARGE CENT KM21 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
Paypal   US $39.00
CANADA 1913 LARGE CENT KM21 BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED GEM BU BROWN
CANADA 1913 LARGE CENT KM21 BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED GEM BU BROWN
Paypal   US $69.00
1997 S Brilliant Gem Proof Washington 25 Cent Quarter
1997 S Brilliant Gem Proof Washington 25 Cent Quarter
Paypal   US $2.30
1943 Wartime Steel Cents PDS Brilliant Uncirculated in plastic holder
1943 Wartime Steel Cents PDS Brilliant Uncirculated in plastic holder
Paypal   US $5.00
CANADA 1929 SMALL CENT KM28 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
CANADA 1929 SMALL CENT KM28 GEM BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED BROWN GEM BU BRN
Paypal   US $69.00
1988 S Brilliant Gem Proof Kennedy 50 Cent Half Dollar
1988 S Brilliant Gem Proof Kennedy 50 Cent Half Dollar
Paypal   US $2.65
1987 S Brilliant Gem Proof Kennedy 50 Cent Half Dollar
1987 S Brilliant Gem Proof Kennedy 50 Cent Half Dollar
Paypal   US $2.80
2011 Canada 25 Cents COLORED ORCA WHALE Coin Mint State Brilliant Uncirculated
2011 Canada 25 Cents COLORED ORCA WHALE Coin Mint State Brilliant Uncirculated
Paypal   US $.99
1909 VDB Lincoln Cent Uncirculated beauty Brilliant appearance
1909 VDB Lincoln Cent Uncirculated beauty Brilliant appearance
Paypal   US $49.00
1968 Cent 25¢ ICCS MS 66 PQ Brilliant and Lustrous a Super GEM
1968 Cent 25¢ ICCS MS 66 PQ Brilliant and Lustrous a Super GEM
Paypal   US $47.66
UNOPENED 2008 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Moose N R
UNOPENED 2008 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Moose N R
Paypal   US $.99
UNOPENED 2004 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Celebration N R
UNOPENED 2004 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Celebration N R
Paypal   US $5.55
1904 Indian Head Cent Pleasing Mostly Mint Red Choice Brilliant Uncirculated
1904 Indian Head Cent Pleasing Mostly Mint Red Choice Brilliant Uncirculated
Paypal   US $.99
1911 Lincoln Cent Brilliant Uncirculated Mint Red Nicely Lusterous Surfaces
1911 Lincoln Cent Brilliant Uncirculated Mint Red Nicely Lusterous Surfaces
Paypal   US $65.00
UNOPENED 2005 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Beaver N R
UNOPENED 2005 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Beaver N R
Paypal   US $5.60
UNOPENED 2003 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Bear N R
UNOPENED 2003 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Bear N R
Paypal   US $9.26
UNOPENED 2002 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents N R
UNOPENED 2002 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents N R
Paypal   US $5.60
2012 1 cent Brilliant Uncirculated Magnetic Fill error on 1
2012 1 cent Brilliant Uncirculated Magnetic Fill error on 1
Paypal   US $.96
1961 D BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED ROLL OF LINCOLN MEMORIAL CENTS 1 ROLL
1961 D BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED ROLL OF LINCOLN MEMORIAL CENTS 1 ROLL
Paypal   US $1.99
1930 LINCOLN CENT IN BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED CONDITION ALL RED
1930 LINCOLN CENT IN BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED CONDITION ALL RED
Paypal   US $18.00
1907 Choice Brilliant Uncirculated Red Indian Head Penny Very Nice Cent
1907 Choice Brilliant Uncirculated Red Indian Head Penny Very Nice Cent
Paypal   US $1.04
1909 P VDB Choice Brilliant Uncirculated Red Lincoln Penny Very Nice Cent
1909 P VDB Choice Brilliant Uncirculated Red Lincoln Penny Very Nice Cent
Paypal   US $10.51
1957 D GOATEE CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRULATED NICE COLOR
1957 D GOATEE CENT BRILLIANT UNCIRULATED NICE COLOR
Paypal   US $3.95
THREE 1960 D CENTS WITH CRACKED SKULLS BRILLIANT UNC
THREE 1960 D CENTS WITH CRACKED SKULLS BRILLIANT UNC
Paypal   US $5.95
BRILLIANT UNC Cyprus 6 Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2008 1 2 5 cent Greece
BRILLIANT UNC Cyprus 6 Coins £ 2004 € Euro 2008 1 2 5 cent Greece
Paypal   US $.99
2010D 1C AND 2010 1C UNION SHIELD BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LINCOLN CENT
2010D 1C AND 2010 1C UNION SHIELD BRILLIANT UNCIRCULATED LINCOLN CENT
Paypal   US $39.99
UNOPENED 2006 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Colouring N R
UNOPENED 2006 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Colouring N R
Paypal   US $1.30
1990 S Lincoln Memorial Cent Penny Proof Coin Brilliant Uncirculated P103
1990 S Lincoln Memorial Cent Penny Proof Coin Brilliant Uncirculated P103
Paypal   US $.99
UNOPENED 2000 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Pride N R
UNOPENED 2000 Canada Brilliant Uncirculated 25 Cents Pride N R
Paypal   US $.99

Cent Brilliant

INTERGENERATIONAL EXCHANGES: A STUDY OF ELDERLY AND THEIR MARRIED CHILDREN

INTERGENERATIONAL EXCHANGES:

A STUDY OF ELDERLY AND THEIR MARRIED CHILDREN

Dr. Anupam Bahri

INTRODUCTION:

The parent-child bond is a continuum of emotional support that lasts a life time of both, the parent and the offspring. This bipolar, linear interaction can vary in frequency, quality and type depending on the age, interests and needs of the two generations. During early childhood the relationship between parent and child is constant and largely unidirectional, because the children are highly dependent on their parents for support. During adolescence, this interaction declines in frequency and becomes more reciprocal as both generations tend to influence each other either through conflict or concordance. The relationship would most probably be characterized by conflict over values, beliefs and behavior (Alpert and Richardson, 1980). Then these very children eventually establish their own families and begin to experience interactions from the parental perspective the relationship with their own parents may decrease further in quantity and quality as new demands are placed on them. Finally as new demands enter midlife and parents grow old, interaction may increase especially if elderly parent becomes increasingly dependent on an adult child. In this situation the relationship once again becomes primarily linear, but in the opposite direction that is, from that of the adult children. More help is given to parents, especially with respect to healthcare. However, there may be a continuing socio-cultural and economic exchange developing in both directions, although whether the direction is parent to child or child to parent may depend on the socio- economic status of the two generations.

Within the family there are physical, emotional, economic and social resources that can be exchanged in a serial or reciprocal manner, depending on the need of the parent or child generation. Serial exchanges tend to be prevalent and generally represent a downward flow of assistance from the older generation to the younger generation because of a sense of responsibility and affection (Moore, 1966). Reciprocal exchange or a two way flow is most common among the central and oldest generations, especially among the middle class. Johnson and Bursk (1977) found that 93 per cent of the elderly in the study, who had adult children, were engaged in a reciprocal pattern of exchange.

This process of exchange usually involved services like babysitting, and/ or nursing the infants that is their grandchildren, counseling, shopping, household maintenance, gifts like money, clothes, appliances, and air or train tickets for visits or interaction in the form of face to face visits, telephone calls or letters (Hill, 1965; Synge et.al., 1981). The form and frequency of exchange varies greatly among families and is influenced by a number of social factors. These include residential propinquity, social class, children’s sex, their own race and ethnicity as well as that of the children, age of the middle and oldest generations and the degree of filial maturity (that is growing concern about parents in the middle years: Blenkner, 1965).The greater the extent to which elderly parents live in proximity to children, the greater the likelihood of visiting and exchanging goods or services.

Class differences in frequency and type of exchange have been found in many studies (Troll and Bengtson, 1979; Neugartan 1979; Lacy and Hendricks, 1980). Shanas (1967), in a study of family help patterns among approximately 25,000 people over 65 years of age in Britain, Denmark and the United States, found that members of every social class were engaged in reciprocal assistance. However, since size of family, living arrangements, family values and economic position varied by social class, the amount, form and frequency of mutual aid also varied. Studies have shown that working–class parents are more likely to exchange services; that the middle class is more likely to exhibit patterns of serial exchange from the oldest to youngest generations. This form of reciprocity is more common among the working class and there is more face to face interaction among the working class. Among them there is more telephoning and letter writing among the middle class because of greater social and geographical mobility.

A marked difference in gender reciprocation has also been observed in familial exchange relationships. Sons often perceived assisting older parents as an instrumental act resulting from an obligation to repay a past debt, whereas daughters, because of long-standing, expressive lineal mother daughter ties, perceived assistance as an expressive, act which they wanted to or needed to perform. As a result, sons generally provided more financial assistance and frequently took decisions about the care of the parents. Daughters almost always seemed to be the primary caregivers (Horowitz, 1981). This may also be because women are more likely to play the traditional nurturing role, because the mother-daughter relationship is strengthened during the adult years, especially after the daughter has become a mother and subsequent sharing has taken place for the care of the little ones( Fischer, 1981). Marshall et.al., (1982) found that daughters worry about parental health more so than do sons. Interestingly enough it is the health of the father which generates more concern and worry than that of mother.

From the perspective of elderly parents, it appears that they primarily offer financial assistance to sons and services to daughters. However, there are great interfamily variations, depending on class and on the individual interest of the parents. If they are still employed, younger grandparents may have neither the time for nor the interest in performing baby sitting or other care-giving service roles. As a result, they may replace this personal assistance with loans or gifts of money.

Another factor influencing the type and frequency of exchange and assistance is the sense of filial responsibility or experiencing filial maturity. This represents the extent to which adult children feel obligated to meet the basic needs of their ageing parents. While the family is an important source of aid and support for the elderly, the expectations of the parents and children as to what should be done may or may not coincide. The chronological age of the children may determine their desirability to assist or interact with their parents. Adult children with very old parents may also be retired and have their own economic and health concerns. Therefore, they may be less able or willing to assist their ageing parents and may tend to abdicate some of their filial responsibility to public or private social service agencies (Gelfand et.al., 1978).

From the perspective of the ageing parents, expectations for filial responsibility seem to be higher with increasing age among females and among the widowed or divorced, if they have few economic resources, if health fails and if their general level of morale or life satisfaction is low (Seelback, 1977, 1978; Seelback and Sauer, 1977). In short, the perception of filial responsibility may influence interaction patterns in later years, where expectations differ, family solidarity is weakened, overt conflict is visible and public or private social agencies may be required to fill the void for visiting, health and household services.

Most research has focused on the type and frequency of exchange between ageing parents and adult children. Quantity rather than quality has been the central concern. Johnson and Bursk (1977) and Johnson (1978) found that the quality of the relationship is influenced by the health, economic and housing situation of the elderly and by attitudes to their personal ageing experience. The level of the affect was higher when the parents were in good health and held positive feelings about their personal ageing process. They also noted that there was more quality interaction in the relationship when parents were socially active outside the extended family. The studies on old age in India are still in their infancy as most of the studies were conducted in the 1960s, or efforts were made to explore the problems of old people. Later, in the 1970s and 1980s social scientists focused attention on issues like the status and role of old people in rural or urban communities and their adjustment in old age. As per Indian studies Mishra (1987) in his study conducted on retired male government employees in Chandigarh found a direct link and a positive correlation between health conditions and their subsequent adjustment. Poor health often leads to the redefinition of the scope of their parental role. Poor health leads to more assistance from adult offspring and it also contributes significantly to negative self feeling.

In other studies conducted by Jamuna (1984, 1987, 1988,1989, 1990,1991), Jumna and Ramamurti (1984, 1989) and Asha and Subramaniam (1990) the problems of aging like adjustment patterns, role activities and acceptance besides husband-wife communication have been examined in detail. They found that as the aging process goes on, it brings in several changes for the individual in terms of role playing and adjustments to be made at various stages. It requires adjustments to changing relations of authority and difference, to changing health situations, inter-generational problems, relations between the spouses, as also economic, social and psychological problems, following ‘exit’ situations like death and bereavement. All these call for adjustment between the aging individual and other members of the family as well as the community. Taking a clue from the research studies conducted in the area and in order to fill the gap in the existing studies the researcher in the present study has attempted to focus on the quality of exchanges rather than quantity of exchange among the elderly parents and their married children in the form of intergenerational exchanges.

MAIN OBJECTIVE:

(i)           To explore the extent of interpersonal exchanges between the elderly and their married children vis-à-vis personal, advisory and financial exchange.

(ii) To find out how far interpersonal exchanges influence the well-being of the elderly.

METHODOLOGY:

The locale of the study was Chandigarh; as amongst the states and union territories of India, Chandigarh had the highest growth rate of the aged and the city has been generally known as the retired men’s paradise.

Chandigarh was planned as an administrative capital city for the state of Punjab in 1951, and over time has emerged as one of the largest and most significant of the new cities in India. The first master plan was prepared in 1949 by the American firm of Mayer, Witlessly and Glass in association with brilliant young Architect Mathew Nowicki. However, Nowicki died in an air crash in 1950 while returning to the United States and the new city had its first setback. Albert Mayer was heart broken and refused to continue the initial plan, which was later on improved by Le-Corbusier.

Le-Corbusier considered the city plan as a biological phenomenon and according to him it has a brain, heart, lung and feet like a human being: it is on this analogy that the city of Chandigarh has been planned to the north lies the capital complex comprising of the Secretariat, High Court, Legislative Assembly which constitute the head, the city centre represents the heart which is located at the junction of two important arteries, that Madhya Marg (V2-station) and Janpath (V2-captial). The network of roads for vehicular traffic and footpaths for pedestrians constitutes the circulation system. The spacious parks and green belts which run through the city act as lungs. The Industrial Area to the East and Panjab university to the West represent the limbs, the former fulfilling the materialistic and the later the spiritual needs of the city.

The universe of the study was the aged who were residing together with their married children in Chandigarh. To identify this universe the Election Commissioner’s Office, located in sector 17, was approached. With the help of the Chairman, Election Commission, the researcher was able to prepare a sector-wise list of elderly voters who were residing with their married children. In all there were 11,826 such cases. Since the population of 60 plus elderly residing together with married children in Chandigarh was very high and they were not equally distributed in different sectors, therefore it was decided to follow a multistage sampling procedure.

To begin with, depending upon the strength of this population in all the 47 sectors (excluding the Colonies and Industrial Area Phase I and Phase II), the sectors were arranged in descending order.  To know about the cutting off point which split the sectors into two equal halves, each having fifty per cent of the population, cumulative frequency was calculated, which came out to be 4, 24, 413 and then divided by two, to know about the mid point which was 2, 12, 206. The dividing point lies between sector 35 and 41 (see Annexure I). Twelve sectors were above the cutting off point and thirty five were below it. Two sector were randomly chosen with the help of random number table from the first half (sector 20 and 22) and three sectors from the second half (sector 42, 19 and 7). The list of households thus obtained and was considered the sampling frame from which random samples of households were proportionately selected; information was gathered from elderly parents and their married children with whom they were staying together in the selected households. In this way the researcher was able to select 198 households in 5 different sectors for which a sample of 343 elderly and 198 households in 5 different sectors for which a sample of 343 elderly and 198 children were interviewed. Sector-wise distribution of the elderly and their married children is given below.

Table 1- Sector-wise distribution of elderly and their married children.

Sectors

Total no. of Households

Elderly staying with their married children

Elderly selected

Married children selected

Households selected

7

165

270

54

33

33

19

160

265

53

32

32

20

255

470

94

51

51

22

240

435

87

48

48

42

170

275

55

34

34

T0tal

990

1715

343

198

198

The intergenerational exchange was studied by taking into consideration the type and extent of exchange which takes place among the elderly and their married children. Exchange variables were articulated into three parts-receiving, giving, both receiving and giving. Each part was studied from three dimensions called financial, personal and advisory. Financial receiving includes the payment of bills, essential needs, luxury items and received cash etc. Personal help includes the help in light and heavy house-keeping, laundry, grocery shopping, cooking, running errands, fixing things around the house, aiding in transportation, help in illness, help in renovating house. In advisory help they received help in countering life’s problems, like running the home, and money or business matters. While giving financial help the researcher included the payment of bills, essential needs, luxury items and giving cash etc. Personally they helped with running errands, taking care of small children, especially when someone was ill and giving advice on life’s problems, running the home, bringing up the children, besides job oriented matters.

Well-being was measured along with two components- cognitive and affective.

(i) In the cognitive dimension the researcher asked questions like things were getting better with growing age, the dearest time of their lives, happier when they were younger, best years of their lives etc.

(ii) In affective measures such questions like ‘why most of the things you do are boring’ ‘feelings of monotonous’, ‘you feel old and tired’, ‘plan things for future’ etc.

Results:

To canvass the entire range of exchanges the researcher reviewed them from three levels personal, advisory and financial.

A separate table was made to measure the personal help among the elderly and their married children with the help of questions as mentioned earlier. The following table throws light on the forms of personal exchange between elderly and their married children.

Personal help:-

Elderly usually prefer to receive help for personal care, every day chores and other ongoing needs from close family members. For example, aged parents who believe that their children would give assistance if the need arises have better psychological well being than those who are less certain about what their off spring’s response would be (Blieszner and Hamon; 1992). The following table will appraise the personal help given or received by both elderly parents and their married children.

Table 2 - Personal exchange among elderly and their married children.

Personal Help

Elderly

Married Children

Giving Help

27(7.9)

70(35.4)

Receiving Help

126(36.7)

15(7.6)

Both Giving And Receiving

190(55.4)

113(57.0)

Total

343(100)

198(100)

On the basis of analysis of the table it was found that 7.9 per cent of the elderly as compared to 35.4 per cent of married children were giving personal help. As against this 36.6 percent of elderly and only 7.6 per cent of married children were receiving help. In case of, however, both giving and receiving 55.4 per cent of elderly and 57 per cent children showed their personal interdependence on each other.

Advisory help:-

Interactions with the children buffer the affects of stressful events and situations, offer emotional sustenance and affirmation of one’s identity, yield needed assistance, help time being structured in meaningful ways, and provide continuity in important roles. Even those ways are very dependent on each other for personal care and assistance can reciprocate with affection, companionship and advice. The following table details the advisory help given by elderly and their married children.

Table 3 - Advisory exchange among elderly and their married children.

Advisory help

Elderly

Married children

Giving help

100(29.2)

56(28.3)

Receiving help

98(28.6)

59(29.8)

Both giving and receiving

145(42.3)

83(41.9)

Total

343(100)

198(100)

From Table 3 it can be summarized that 29.2 per cent of the elderly and 28.3 per cent of married children were giving advisory help to each other. On the other hand 28.6 per cent of the elderly and 29.8 per cent of the married children were receiving help. It was, however, noticed that 42.3 per cent of the elderly as well as 41.9 per cent of the married children were both giving and receiving advisory help from each other. It again proved their interdependence.

Financial help:-

The following table throws light on the forms of financial help between elderly and their married children.

Table 4 - Financial exchange among elderly and their married children.

Financial help

Elderly

Married children

Giving help

104(30.3)

56(28.3)

Receiving help

87(25.4)

59(29.8)

Both giving and receiving

152(44.3)

83(41.9)

Total

343(100)

198(100)

It was clear from the Table 4 that nearly 30.3 per cent of the elderly as compared to 28.3 per cent of married children were giving help. Against this 29.8 per cent of married children as compared to 25.4 per cent of elderly were receiving financial help. It was found that 41.9 per cent of elderly and 44.3 per cent of married children were both giving and receiving financial help from each other which showed their inter-dependence.

Overall interdependence level:-

To ascertain if the elderly were considered as an asset or burden by their married children an overall analysis of financial, personal and advisory help was carried out. For this three categories were made-dependent, independent and interdependent. The following Table shows the extent to which the elderly were considered as asset or burden by married children as well as the level of their dependency on each other.

Table 5 - Overall interdependence level of elderly and their married children.

Interdependence Level

Elderly

Married Children

Dependent

104(30.3)

45(22.7)

Independent

77(22.5)

57(28.8)

Interdependent

162(47.2)

96(48.5)

Total

343(100)

198(100)

Table 5 shows that 30.3 per cent of elderly and 22.7 per cent of married children were dependent on each other. However 22.5 per cent of the elderly and 28.9 per cent of their married children were independent. As against these, 47.2 per cent of elderly and 48.5 per cent of the married children showed their interdependence on each other. So it is very clear that majority of elderly as well as married children are inter-dependent on each other.

Table 6 Well- being of elderly and their married children.

Cognitive

Elderly

Married Children

Low

51     (14.8)

41     (20.7)

Medium

90     (26.2)

121   (61.1)

High

202   (59.0)

36     (18.2)

Affective

Low

121    (35.4)

26      (12.9)

Medium

137    (39.7)

42       (21.2)

High

85      (24.9)

130     (65.9)

Over all well- Being

Low

86       (25.1)

34       (17.2)

Medium

114     (33.2)

83       (41.9)

High

143     (41.7)

81        (40.9)

Total

343     (100)

198      (100)

The Table 6 depicts that the elderly were comparatively more capable of enjoying well being in life than their married children. Elderly were having medium affective well- being whereas married children were high on affective well-being. Analysis indicate that both are high on well being scale whereas married children were little more on the medium side. It may be due to new challenges and problems in the life of the of younger generation.

Overall picture that emerges from these concludes that the majority of elderly parents as well as their married children were both giving and receiving financial, personal and advisory help from each other. However, the giving and receiving of help is not on equal footing in each category. Who-so-ever is strong is giving and the other is receiving help. This shows the cordial relations of the family.

To know the effect of the overall interdependence level on the well-being of the aged, cross tabulation was made and to check the accuracy of the Table the test of Lambda was applied.

Table 7 : Cognitive well- being and personal help among elderly.

Cognitive Personal help

Low

Medium

High

Total

Giving

26(50.9)

(96.3)

1(3.7)

(1.1)

0

27(100)

Receiving

7(5.6)

(1.4)

86(68.3)

(95.6)

33(26.2)

(16.3)

126(100)

Both giving and receiving help

18(9.5)

(35.3)

3(1.6)

(3.3)

169(88.9)

(83.7)

190(100.)

Total

51

(100)

90

(100)

200

(100)

343

Lambda-0.6

It is clear from Table 7 that a large majority of the elderly who were both giving and receiving personal help were high on their cognitive well-being level. The elderly who were receiving personal help were having medium cognitive well-being. On the other hand, the elderly who were giving personal help had low cognitive well-being. The analysis of the Table from the row side envisages the same results. The value of the lambda came out to be 0.6 which showed very high association between cognitive well-being and personal help.

Table 8 : Cognitive well-being and advisory help among elderly.

Cognitive Advisory help

Low

Medium

High

Total

Giving

46(46.0)

(90.2)

3(3.0)

(3.3)

51(51.0)

(25.2)

100(100)

Receiving

1(1.0)

(1.9)

87(88.8)

(96.7)

10(10.2)

(4.9)

98(100)

Both giving and receiving

4(2.8)

(7.8)

0

141(97.2)

(69.8)

145(100)

Total

51(100)

(100)

90

(100)

202

(100)

343

Lambda-0.6

Table 8 shows that the majority of the elderly (96.7) with medium well-being level were receiving advisory help as compared to the elderly (90.2) with low well-being level who were giving advisory help. More than half of the elderly (69.8) who were both giving and receiving advisory help from their married children were high on their cognitive well-being. The row side of the table shows the same results. Lambda value came out to be 0.06 which showed a very high association between cognitive well-being and advisory exchange

Table 9 - Cognitive Well-being and financial help among elderly.

Cognitive Financial help

Low

Medium

High

Total

Giving

49(47.1)

96.1)

19(18.3)

(21.1)

36(34.6)

(17.8)

104(100)

Receiving

2(2.3)

(3.9)

69(79.3)

(76.7)

16(18.4)

(7.9)

87(100.)

Both giving and receiving

0

2(1.3)

(2.2)

150(98.7)

(74.3)

152(100.0)

Total

51

(100)

90

(100)

202

(100)

343

Lambda- 0.5

Table 9 exhibits that the majority of the elderly who were both giving and receiving financial help were high on cognitive well-being. More than half of the elderly who were receiving financial help were having medium levels of cognitive well-being as compared to those elderly (less than half) who were giving financial help were low on their well-being level. The analysis of the table from row side shows the same results. Lambda was applied to check the association, its value came out to be 0.5 which shows a high association with each other. Thus it can be concluded that cognitive well-being is directly related with the financial help extended by the elderly.

Table 10 - Affective Well-being and personal help among elderly

Affective Personal help

Low

Medium

High

Total

Giving

25(92.6)

(20.7)

1(3.7)

(0.7)

1(3.7)

(0.7)

27(100)

Receiving

69(64.3)

(66.9)

49(27.8)

(41.2)

8(7.9)

(7.3)

126(100)

Both giving and receiving

27(7.9)

(66.9)

35(25.8)

57.6)

128(66.3)

(92.0)

190(100)

Total

121 (100)

85 (100)

137 (100)

343

Lambda-0.4

The above table shows that majority of the elderly (92.0) with high affective well-being were both giving and receiving personal help from their married children. The elderly (66.9) with low affective well-being were receiving personal help. The analysis of the table from row side shows that elderly (92.6) who were giving personal help were low on their affective well-being level as compared with the elderly (66.3) who were both giving and receiving personal help and were high on their affective well-being level. The calculated value of lambda came out to be 0.4 which shows high association between affective well-being and personal help among the elderly parents and their married children.

Table 11 - Affective Well-being and Advisory Help among Elderly.

Affective Advisory Help

Low

Medium

High

Total

Giving

80(80.0)

(66.1)

5(5.0)

(5.9)

15(15.0)

(10.4)

100(100)

Receiving

19(19.4)

(15.7)

72(73.5)

(84.7)

7(7.1)

(5.1)

98(100)

Both giving and receiving

22(15.2)

(18.2)

8(5.5)

(9.4)

11579.3)

(83.9)

145(100)

Total

121(100)

85(100)

137(100)

343

Lambda-0.6

Table 11 shows that majority of the elderly with high affective well-being were both giving and receiving advisory help from their married children. Elderly with low affective well-being were giving advisory help as compared with the elderly with medium well-being who were receiving advisory help. Analysis of the table from row side concludes the same results. The value of lambda came out to be 0.6 which showed very high association between affective well-being and advisory help.

Table 12 - Affective Well-being and Financial help among Elderly.

Affective Financial help

Low

Medium

High

Total

Giving

99(95.2)

(81.8)

2(1.9)

(2.4)

3(2.9)

(2.2)

104(100)

Receiving

17(19.5)

14.0)

65(74.7)

(76.5)

5(5.7)

3.6)

87(100)

Both giving and receiving

5(3.3)

(4.2)

18(11.8)

21.0)

129(84.9)

(94.2)

152(100)

Total

121

85

137

343

Lambda-0.7

Table 12 shows that a large majority of the elderly (94.2) with high effective well-being were both giving and receiving financial help from their married children. The elderly (81.8) with low well-being were giving financial help and the elderly (76.5) with medium well-being were receiving financial help. The row side of the table envisages the same results. The calculated value of lambda was 0.7 which shows high association between affective well-being and financial help.

Table 13 - Cognitive well-being and overall interdependence among elderly.

Cognitive

Overall

interdependence

Low

Medium

High

Total

Dependent

40(38.5)

(78.5)

30(28.8)

(33.3)

34(32.7)

(16.8)

104(100)

Independent

9(11.7)

(17.6)

55(7145)

(61.1)

13(16.9)

(6.4)

77(100)

Interdependent

2(1.2)

(3.9)

5(3.1)

(5.6)

155(95.7)

(76.7)

162(100)

Total

51(100)

90(100)

202 (100)

343

Lambda - 0.4

It is clear from Table 13 that the majority of the elderly who were interdependent (95.7) were high on their cognitive well-being level in comparison with those who were dependent (38.5). Those who were independent (71.4) have medium well-being levels. if we analysis the table from column side  it was envisaged that those who were low on their cognitive well-being level were dependent on their children (78.5) and more than half of those who were high on their cognitive well-being level were interdependent on their married children. Lambda was applied to check the association between cognitive well-being and overall interdependence level of elderly parents with their married children. The calculated value of lambda came out to be 0.4 which showed a high association with each other. Thus, it can be concluded that the cognitive well-being had been directly related with overall interdependence of levels of the elderly.

Table 14 - Affective well- being and overall interdependence level among elderly.

Affective

Overall

Interdependence

Low

Medium

High

Total

Dependent

99(9.2)

(81.8)

4(3.8)

(4.7)

1(1.0)

(1.0)

104(100.0))

Independent

13(16.9)

(10.7)

57(74)

(67.1)

67(9.1)

(5.1)

77(100.0)

Interdependent

9(5.6)

(7.4)

24(14.8)

(28.2)

129(79.6)

(94.2)

162(100.0)

Total

121(100.O)

85(100.0)

137(100.0)

343(100.0)

Lambda-0.6

Table 14 denoted that a majority of the elderly (94.2%) who were high on their affective well-being were interdependent. Three-fourths of the elderly who were low on their affective well-being were dependent. While analyzing table from row side, it was seen that a majority of elderly who were dependent were low on their affective well-being level. On the other side more than half of the elderly with high affective well-being were interdependent. Test of Lambda was applied to check the association between them. The value of lambda came out to be 0.6 which showed high association among them. Thus, it can be concluded that affective well being is directly related with overall interdependent level.

Table 15 - Overall well-being and overall interdependence level among elderly.

Overall Well-Being

Overall

Interdependence

Low

Medium

High

Total

Dependent

70(67.3)

(81.0)

29(27.9)

(4.7)

5(4.8)

(3.5)

104(100)

Independent

7(9.1)

(8.0)

70(90.9)

(61.4)

0(0)

(0)

77(100)

Interdependent

9(5.6)

(10.5)

15(9.3)

(13.2)

138(85.2)

(96.5)

162

Total

86(100)

114(100)

143(100)

343

Lambda-0.6

Table 15 envisaged that a majority of the elderly(96.5) with high overall well-being were interdependent and three-fourths of the of elderly with low well-being levels were dependent upon their married children. More than half (61.4) with medium well-being were independent. On the other hand if we analyses the table from the row side it reveals that a majority of the elderly who were independent were have medium levels of well-being. More than three-fourths of the elderly (85.2) who were interdependent were high on their well-being levels and more than half of the elderly (67.3) who were dependent were low on their well-being levels. Test of lambda was applied, and value of it came out to be 0.4 which showed a high association between overall well being and overall interdependence levels. Thus, it can be summarized that overall well-being do have impact on the interdependence level of the elderly.

Discussion of results:

The basis of exchange between elderly parents and their married children changes throughout the life cycle, depending on each side’s circumstances. As far as the present context is concerned, this patterns of exchange focus on the principle of reciprocity which operates among them and its effect on their levels of well-being. The reciprocity operates in a direct manner, where the givers are also the receivers within the same relationship. Majority of the elderly and their married children were interdependent on financial, personal and advisory help which means both were giving as well as receiving help from each other. A small number of elderly were independent and they were only helping the children and getting nothing in return. Similarly a small number of elderly were totally dependent on the children and they were only the recipients of help but not giving anything in return. The majority of the elderly who gave financial help to the children were receiving personal help from them and the elderly who received financial help were giving personal help to the children if their health permitted. The advisory help to each other was based on who was more intelligent and had better state of mind to offer help. The elderly who were financially well off were however found to be enjoying better well-being. Finally it was found that the elderly who had reciprocal relationship with their married children were enjoying high levels of well-being than those who were independent or dependent.

About the Author

Name : Dr.Anupam Bahri
Qualification : Ph.D
Working with : GCG College, Chandigarh
Total work ex : 10 years


50 Cent


50 Cent


$10


50 Cent

Curtis Jackson- 50 Cent


Curtis Jackson- 50 Cent


$10


Curtis Jackson- 50 Cent

Special Caricatures - 50 Cent


Special Caricatures - 50 Cent


$10


Special Caricatures - 50 Cent

49 Cent Calling


49 Cent Calling


$10


49 Cent Calling

10 Cent Billionaire


10 Cent Billionaire


$10.49


10 Cent Billionaire

Maximum 50 Cent


Maximum 50 Cent


$7.49


Maximum 50 Cent

Salon des Cent


Salon des Cent


$19.99


Salon des Cent - Masterprint

The Bulletin, One Cent


The Bulletin, One Cent


$59.99


The Bulletin, One Cent - Wall Decal

40 Cent Stamp


40 Cent Stamp


$21.99


40 Cent Stamp - T-Shirt

Cent Mille Lieues


Cent Mille Lieues


$39.99


Cent Mille Lieues - Giclee Print

Rosier a Cent Feuilles


Rosier a Cent Feuilles


$54.99


Rosier a Cent Feuilles - Art Print

Brilliant


Brilliant


$8.99


Brilliant

50 Cent - Crime Wave


50 Cent - Crime Wave


$6


50 Cent - Crime Wave - DJ ReDo

Cinq cent mille miles


Cinq cent mille miles


$6


Cinq cent mille miles - Antoine Gratton

Format (ft. 50 Cent)


Format (ft. 50 Cent)


$6


Format (ft. 50 Cent) - El DeBarge

Psycho (Orig. 50 Cent)


Psycho (Orig. 50 Cent)


$6


Psycho (Orig. 50 Cent) - DJ Cover This

22 Exposition des Cent


22 Exposition des Cent


$64.99


22 Exposition des Cent - Giclee Print
 

Leave a Reply

wordpress visitor